|
1
|
- CMS 1910 P2:
- Medicare Program; Changes in Conditions of Participation Requirements
and Payment Provisions for Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified
Health Centers: Proposed Rule
|
|
2
|
- CAPT Corinne Axelrod, MPH, LAc, Dipl.Ac
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
- Center for Medicare Management (CMM)
- Hospital and Ambulatory Policy Group (HAPG)
- Division of Ambulatory Services (DAS)
- 410-786-5620
- corinne.axelrod@cms.hhs.gov
|
|
3
|
- I. Staffing Requirements, Waivers, & Contracts
- II. Payment Issues
- III. Additional Resources
- IV. Q & A
|
|
4
|
- Special Requirements for RHCs
- 1. Must have an NP, PA, or CNM at least 50% of the time the clinic
operates (OBRA ’89)
- 2. Must employ one or more NP or PA
|
|
5
|
- Does not include the time that an RHC is open solely to address administrative
matters or provide shelter
- Existing RHCs would be able to apply for a one year waiver of this
requirement
- To be granted a waiver, RHCs would have to demonstrate a good faith effort to
recruit and hire an NP, PA, or CNM within the past 90 days
|
|
6
|
- RHCs that submit a waiver request would be granted a one year waiver
unless they are notified within 60 days that the request is denied
- Would be able to reapply for another waiver 6 months after the
expiration of the last waiver
- RHCs that do not meet this requirement and do not request a waiver would
be decertified
|
|
7
|
- “Employ” – usually evidenced by the employer’s provision of a W-2 form
to the employee
- Must employ an NP or PA at all times
- The NP or PA would not be required to be a full time employee
|
|
8
|
- Regulation prohibiting RHCs from contracting with non-physician
providers would be removed
- RHC would be allowed to contract with non-physician providers as long as
at least 1 NP or PA is employed
|
|
9
|
- Questions on RHC Staffing Requirements, Waivers, or Contracting?
|
|
10
|
- Exceptions to the Payment Limit
- Payment Methodology
- Commingling
- Payment for High Cost Drugs
|
|
11
|
- Available to RHCs that are an integral and subordinate part of a
hospital with less than 50 beds determined by either of 2 methods:
- Bed count as described in 412.105(b) or
- For sole community hospitals, the average daily census does not exceed
40 and the hospital in a RUCA 9 or 10
|
|
12
|
- Proposes to use RUCAs instead of UICs (Urban Influence Codes)
- More precise measurement of rurality
- Consistent with other CMS programs (e.g. hospital and ambulance payment
systems)
- - More RHCs should be eligible for the exception to the payment limit
|
|
13
|
- 1833(a)(3)of the SSA, as amended by the MMA, states that (except for
pneumoccocal and influenza vaccine and their administration), Medicare
payment cannot exceed 80 percent of reasonable costs
- 1866(a)(2)(A)(ii) states that coinsurance cannot exceed 20 percent of
reasonable charges
|
|
14
|
- Current: Medicare pays RHCs 80% of reasonable costs
- Proposed: Medicare pays RHCs reasonable costs minus coinsurance and
deductible (based on facility charges), not to exceed 80 percent of
reasonable costs
|
|
15
|
- RHCs with per-visit payment limit
- RHCs with exception to the payment limit
|
|
16
|
- Upper payment limit= $75.63
- Clinic charges $100
- Current Method
- Medicare payment = $60.50 (80% of $75.63)
- Patient obligation = $20 (20% of $100)
- Clinic revenue = $80.50 ($60.50 + $20)
- Proposed Method
- Medicare payment = $55.63 ($75.63 - $20)
- Patient obligation = $20 (20% of $100)
- Clinic revenue = $75.63 (2008 per visit limit)
|
|
17
|
- Clinic’s Allowable Cost Per Visit (prior to application of beneficiary
obligation) = $80
- Clinic charges $100
- Current Method
- Medicare payment = $64 (80% of $80)
- Patient obligation = $20 (20% of $100)
- Clinic revenue = $84 ($64 + $20)
- Proposed Method
- Medicare payment = $60 ($80 - $20)
- Patient obligation = $20 (20% of $100)
- Clinic revenue = $80 ($60 + $20)
|
|
18
|
- Upper payment limit= $75.63
- Clinic charges $80
- Current Method
- Medicare payment = $60.50 (80% of $75.63)
- Patient Obligation = $16 (20% of $80)
- Clinic revenue = $76.50 ($60.50 + $16)
- Proposed Method
- Medicare payment = $59.63 ($75.63 - $16)
- Patient obligation = $16 (20% of $80)
- Clinic revenue = $75.63 (2008 per visit limit)
|
|
19
|
- Clinic’s Allowable Cost Per Visit (prior to application of beneficiary
obligation) = $80
- Clinic charges $80
- Current Method
- Medicare payment = $64 (80% of $80)
- Patient obligation = $16 (20% of $80)
- Clinic revenue =$80 ($64 + $16)
- Proposed Method
- Medicare payment = $64 ($80 - $16)
- Patient obligation = $16 (20% of $80)
- Clinic revenue = $80 ($64 + $16)
|
|
20
|
- Upper payment limit= $75.63
- Clinic charges $70
- Current Method
- Medicare payment = $60.50 (80% of 75.63)
- Patient obligation = $14 (20% of $70)
- Clinic revenue = $74.50 ($60.50 + $14)
- Proposed Method
- Medicare payment = $60.50 (80% of 75.63)
- Patient obligation = $14 (20% of $70)
- Clinic revenue = $74.50 (2008 per visit limit)
|
|
21
|
- Clinic’s Allowable Cost Per Visit (prior to application of beneficiary
obligation) = $80
- Clinic charges $70
- Current Method
- Medicare payment = $64 (80% of $80)
- Patient obligation = $14 (20% of $70)
- Clinic revenue =$78 ($64 + $14)
- Proposed Method
- Medicare payment = $64* ($80 – $14 = $66 – $2)
- Patient obligation = $14 (20% of $70)
- Clinic revenue = $78 ($64 + $14)
- *$80 -$14 = $66, which would exceed 80% of the allowable cost
|
|
22
|
- The sharing of RHC space, staff (employees or contractors), supplies,
records, and other resources with an onsite Medicare Part B or Medicaid
fee-for-service practice operated by the same RHC practitioners
(physician or non-physician)
|
|
23
|
- It results in duplicate Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement, either due
to the inability of the RHC to distinguish its actual costs from those
that are reimbursed on a fee for service basis, or for any other reasons
- The RHC and a Medicare fee-for-service practice operate simultaneously
to select patient encounters for enhanced reimbursement
|
|
24
|
- The RHC shares some resources with a non-RHC entity (e.g. a multipurpose
clinic) and maintains accurate records to assure that the RHC costs are
only for those resources used for RHC purposes
- The RHC shares its practitioners with the ER of the hospital in an
emergency or provides on-call services for an ER and continues to meet
the conditions for certification and allocates appropriately the
practitioner’s salary between RHC and non-RHC time
|
|
25
|
- Contact your MAC, FI, Carrier, or RO to
- Determine permissible resource-sharing situations
- Determine proper cost reporting methods
|
|
26
|
- RHC reimbursement includes the cost of drugs provided incident to a
patient visit
- High cost drugs (e.g. cancer treatments) may pose a financial risk
- Soliciting comments with possible solutions that are consistent with
legislative requirements, commingling policies, and administrative
accountability
|
|
27
|
- Questions on Payment Requirements?
|
|
28
|
- CMS Rural ODF
- July 29, 2008 2-3 pm EST
- CMS Special RHC ODF
- August 5, 2008 2-4 pm EST
|
|
29
|
- Region I – George Kazanjian (617) 565-1282
- Region II – Frank Lifrieri (212) 616-2519
- Region III - Patrick Hamilton
(215)-861-4097
- Region IV – Lana Dennis (404) 562-7379
- Region V – Christine Davidson (312) 886-3642
- Region VI – Beck Peal-Sconce (214) 767-6444
- Region VII – Robert Epps (816) 426-6538
- Region VIII – Lyla Nichols 303-844-6218
- Region IX – Neal Logue (415) 744-3551
- Region X – Alma Hardy (206) 615-2387
|
|
30
|
- Comment period closes 5:00 p.m. on August 26, 2008
- All comments will be considered and addressed in the Final Rule
- Provisions of the Final Rule will be effective 60 days after publication
of the Final Rule, unless otherwise noted
|
|
31
|
- Thank You!
- Corinne Axelrod
|